Patent
- 1.India Group Report 2014
- 2.PATENT DECISIONS ON SECTION 8 (2)
- a.Fresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd v Glaxo Group Ltd. (Order No. 162/2013-IPAB)
- b.Chemtura Corporation vs Union of India (Delhi High Court, 2009)
- c.Tata Chemicals Limited v Hindustan Unilever Ltd.(Order No. 166/2012-IPAB)
- d.Koninklijke_Philips_Electronics_vs_Maj._(Retd)_Sukesh_Behl_&_Anr (Delhi High Court, 2013)
- 3.DECISIONS ON VOLUNTARILY FILED DIVISIONAL PATENT APPLICATIONS
- a.LG Electronics Inc v The Controller of Patents (Order No. 111/2011-IPAB)
- b.Sygenta Participations AG v Union of India (Order No. 19/2013-IPAB)
- c.Bayer Animal Health v Union of India (Order No. 243/2012-IPAB)
- d.Bayer AG v Union of India (Order No. 30/2013-IPAB)
- 4.DRAFT GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PATENT APPLICATIONS
- 5.Guidelines for Examination of Biotechnology Applications
- 6.Guidelines for examination of computer related inventions
- 7.WRIT PETITION CHALLENGING CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE TRADEMARKS ACT AND PATENTS ACT RELATED TO ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD (IPAB)
